If refer to sound quality, any lossless audio format (lossless or not) is the same to store 44.1 kHz / 16 bit. NOTE: Dithering estimating on the lowest-loudness levels of a recording is encouraged.

But for some recordings, special dithering can reduce the impact of correlated distortions, that degrade a sound, theoretically.Īpplying of dither can cause a higher noise level. Does it make sense to apply dithering to ripped audio files? But, when we consider this matter in conjunction with used equipment, we can get another result. Contrary, it causes some small losses (distortions its level depends on used conversion software). Theoretically, upsampling can't improve sound quality. And you want to ask: can I get better sound quality via upsampling to maximal sample rate and bit depth of my audio system? What about sound quality improvement?Īs rule, your audio system (Digital Audio Player, home audio, mobile phone, DAC or others) supports sample rates higher than 44.1 kHz / 16 bit. But the author still doesn't know about professional researches FLAC vs. For that case was implemented so-called 'uncompressed FLAC'. There is an opinion, that lossless compression (like FLAC) can degrade sound when playback (was discussed here). If a conversion software work correctly and without sound processing, the binary content will identical.

But we can pack WAV1 to FLAC, unpack FLAC to WAV2 and compare the binary content of WAV1 and WAV2. And we cannot directly compare binary content WAV and FLAC, in instance. What is the best audio format for sound quality? All these formats are identical by binary audio content and able to keep the full CD's sound quality.įLAC and ALAC store compressed data. Lossless files may be recommended as the best format to rip CD:

Best cd mp3 ripping software